// Pros/cons + extra detail for comparison-first redesign
const TOOL_DETAILS = {
  codeforge:   { pros: ['Best-in-class IDE integration', 'Agentic refactor across files', 'Strong free tier (50 msgs/day)', 'Privacy mode disables training'], cons: ['Slows on huge monorepos', 'Occasional hallucinated imports', 'Pricing creeps after 3 seats'], bestFor: 'Solo devs and small teams who live in their IDE', notFor: 'Teams that need on-prem deployment today' },
  pairwise:    { pros: ['Fast inline completions', 'Multi-cursor agent mode', 'Works in 14 IDEs incl. JetBrains beta', 'Predictable per-seat pricing'], cons: ['No CLI yet', 'Weak on Rust + Zig', 'Free tier is teaser-only'], bestFor: 'Teams standardising on one tool across editors', notFor: 'CLI-first workflows' },
  shellsmith:  { pros: ['100% local, zero telemetry', 'Open weights, Apache-2.0', 'CLI-native, scripts well', 'Works offline on a plane'], cons: ['Setup is fiddly', 'Slower than cloud peers', 'No GUI'], bestFor: 'Privacy-first developers and air-gapped envs', notFor: 'People who want zero setup' },
  devstream:   { pros: ['Best PR review summaries', 'Catches subtle security issues', 'GitHub + GitLab + Bitbucket', 'SOC2 Type II'], cons: ['Slow on large diffs', 'No chat mode', 'Enterprise pricing only'], bestFor: 'Engineering orgs >20 people', notFor: 'Hobbyists' },

  transcribr:  { pros: ['Real-time captions + translation', 'Joins Zoom/Meet/Teams', 'Searchable transcript archive', 'Generous free tier'], cons: ['Action items are mediocre', 'Custom vocab is paid-only', 'No on-device option'], bestFor: 'Teams with international meetings', notFor: 'Privacy-strict orgs' },
  minutemate:  { pros: ['Action items actually work', '14 calendar integrations', 'Email summaries auto-send', 'Speaker identification'], cons: ['No live captions', 'No free tier worth speaking of', 'Slack-only delivery'], bestFor: 'Sales / customer success teams', notFor: 'On-device workflows' },
  scribed:     { pros: ['Runs entirely on your laptop', 'Zero cloud, zero subscription', 'Whisper-grade accuracy', 'Open source'], cons: ['No live transcription', 'Mac/Linux only', 'Manual workflow'], bestFor: 'Solo professionals + privacy hawks', notFor: 'Teams that need shared archives' },

  hearthlm:    { pros: ['Apple Silicon optimised', 'Drag-drop GGUF model loading', '1-click hosted bridge', 'Active community'], cons: ['Windows lags Mac builds', 'No fine-tuning UI', 'Eats RAM'], bestFor: 'Mac power users running open-weights', notFor: 'CUDA/Linux server use' },
  orbit7b:     { pros: ['Beats GPT-3.5 on bench', 'Tiny enough for laptops', 'Tool-use trained', 'Apache-2.0'], cons: ['English-strong, weaker multilingual', 'Long-context limited to 32K', 'No vision'], bestFor: 'Hackers building local agents', notFor: 'Production workloads' },
  privacypod:  { pros: ['Self-host in 1 docker run', 'OIDC + audit logs', 'Plug any local model in', 'No data leaves your VPC'], cons: ['Devops time required', 'No mobile clients', 'UI feels enterprise-y'], bestFor: 'Compliance-heavy enterprise', notFor: 'Solo users' },

  reelweaver:  { pros: ['Best motion quality at 1080p', 'Image-to-video that holds character', '8s clips on free tier', 'Built-in voiceover'], cons: ['Slow render queues at peak', 'Watermark on free tier', 'No commercial license under $30/mo'], bestFor: 'Marketers shipping social ads', notFor: 'Long-form video' },
  frameforge:  { pros: ['Photoreal avatars', '40+ languages dubbed', 'PowerPoint to video pipeline', 'Strong free tier'], cons: ['Lip-sync drifts on long lines', 'Licensing is a maze', 'Limited expressions'], bestFor: 'Training videos + corporate comms', notFor: 'Cinematic / storytelling video' },
  cuttr:       { pros: ['Auto cuts silences + filler words', 'B-roll from prompt', 'Fast (under 2 min for 10 min vid)', 'Browser-based'], cons: ['Music library is small', 'No team workspaces', 'Exports cap at 4K paid only'], bestFor: 'YouTubers + podcasters', notFor: 'Studio teams' },

  lexreader:   { pros: ['Citation-grade accuracy', 'Built-in case-law refs (US/UK)', 'Audit trail per redline', 'SOC2 + HIPAA ready'], cons: ['Steep price', 'Onboarding takes weeks', 'US/UK law only'], bestFor: 'Mid-size law firms + in-house legal', notFor: 'Solo practitioners on a budget' },
  briefly:     { pros: ['Cheaper than competitors', 'Word + Google Docs plugins', 'Clause library is excellent', 'Fast'], cons: ['Weaker on litigation docs', 'No bulk processing', 'Email support only'], bestFor: 'Contract-heavy roles in mid-market', notFor: 'Litigation / case-heavy practice' },

  aurora:      { pros: ['Best generalist on hard reasoning', '1M token context', 'Native code execution', 'Strong API + ecosystem'], cons: ['Pricier per token than peers', 'Image gen via partner only', 'Rate-limited at peak'], bestFor: 'Most things, most people', notFor: 'Hobby budgets' },
  sable:       { pros: ['Long-document analysis is unmatched', 'Voice mode is natural', 'Free tier is generous now', 'Strong on writing tasks'], cons: ['Weaker on math vs Aurora', 'API access is gated', 'Smaller plugin ecosystem'], bestFor: 'Writers, researchers, analysts', notFor: 'Heavy code generation' },
  pollen:      { pros: ['Best multimodal understanding', 'Cheapest API on the big-3', 'Workspace integrations baked in', 'Search + sources by default'], cons: ['Personality is dry', 'Plugins are uneven', 'Privacy controls feel shallow'], bestFor: 'People already in Workspace/Office', notFor: 'Long-form creative writing' },
};

window.TOOL_DETAILS = TOOL_DETAILS;